Comment · Mon, August 31, 2015 · Ceretropic
Am I risking seratonin symdrom?
What they were answering
flare1028us · 1 points
I'll admit my comment was exaggerated to make a point, but yes I agree. There's a lot of opportunity out there, and I (and the rest of us) don't want to see that ruined due to omission of the caution that is almost second nature to us.
What would be a reasonable way for vendors to combat said ignorance (and cover their asses legally) with education aside from a big warning that says product X can kill you if you don't follow the directions? I mean, even if I had no idea what caffeine and NALT were, I would have figured out the safety part between the bold red warning on the website and skull/crossbones on the packaging.
I joked about someone messing around with AFA because I am curious to try microdosing it sometime, but I fear that it may not stick around long enough due to the threads of people being like "can confirm, its addictive. I got spun" - No shit?
u/MisterYouAreSoDumb · Ceretropic
What would be a reasonable way for vendors to combat said ignorance (and cover their asses legally) with education aside from a big warning that says product X can kill you if you don't follow the directions?
I think vendors should have warnings on products stating that people should consult applicable research before using a compound. I do not think it should be up to vendors to educate people on the specific pharmacology. However, they should make people aware that they should understand what a product does before using it. I think effect-based marketing statements should be avoided on labels too. So no big effect claims on the bottle. People should have to research what a product is, rather than just grab something off a shelf because it has the word memory on it.