Skip to content

Comment · Thu, December 18, 2014 · Ceretropic

Noohack.com example of hyperbolic exaggerating language.

Original post in this thread

theskepticalidealist · 60 points

Sorry to call you out Noohack, but it pisses me off to see companies do this. You're new and you should not go down this road. You're not the only company that exaggerates the effects of nootropics, but this is one of the worst examples I've seen in a while, barring a few notable exceptions.

Oxiracetam does not give you a photographic memory, no "nootropic" does, at least not yet. (And no, saying "near" doesn't help). This is such an exaggeration it might as well be a lie. The old Nootropics.co.uk used to sell similar products (pressed pills of pure powder), but from what I saw they only repeated what the scientific literature said and gave you links to all those studies if you wanted to see them. There's many ways to make a substance sound more effective than it is in a much more honest way.

I expect most people that come to the site anyway will be people that already know about the substance and just want a good deal from a trustworthy vendor. If people (are stupid enough) to buy a product without researching it first, they will be disappointed and you'll have to deal with the complaints and you may even put someone off nootropics com…

What they were answering

silverhydra · 4 points

I wouldn't personally.

That being said if that Bill guy from accounting is super smart and makes it sound all safe and shit and I don't understand science I totally would buy some, maybe so I can be Bill guy smart.

\#averageconsumer

u/MisterYouAreSoDumb · Ceretropic

I can confirm, Bill buys from us. Haha

However, you cannot prevent that. You can make all the big red warnings you want, and Bill will still ignore them. It's really the people trying to actively market to Bill that need to ease up on the wording. Bill might read the description on Noohack's site, and decide to buy it. That is what should be avoided. If Mary from accounts payable tells Bill that she loves Hydrafinil, and that he should try it, I could put "Don't buy this" as a description, and he would still get it. In the end, Bill is a grown man that makes his own decisions.

Other MYASD lines in this thread

Related in the archive

Commentr/NootropicsFeb 24, 2021

Nootropics Depot not posting negative review

So we had to deal with some pretty big lawsuits last year. I wish I could say that is new, but I deal with half a dozen lawsuits every year. I just settled one two days ago, in fact. I have two more I am dealing with rig

475Lion’s maneCordyceps
Postr/NootropicsSep 18, 2013

Cerebral Health Pyritinol Test Results (WARNING)

Many of you may remember the issue that came up with Cerebral Health/Bioscience Nutraceuticals a few months ago, where their choline bitartrate was numbing people's mouths. After sending those samples in to the lab, the

491239OxiracetamAlpha-GPCRacetams
Postr/NootropicsJul 18, 2023

Independent Lab Testing Results Of Supplements On The Market

Hey everyone, it's been a while since I have made a post in this sub. However, I saw a new research study today that I wanted to bring up. It highlights why my main mission over the past 10 years has been to not only adv

402152Dosing
Commentr/NootropicsJun 11, 2018

Ceretropic will be closed permanently on 6/22/18

Almost exactly 5 years ago, Jason and I were creating Ceretropic and getting it ready for launch. It was mid June 2013. When you reach the end, you inevitably start looking back at the beginning. I had just had a shoulde

329
Postr/NootropicsNov 4, 2014

/u/Guacamolium

Unfortunately, I have some bad news. Jason (/u/Guacamolium), my business partner and co-founder of Ceretropic has died. He was found dead in his apartment on Friday afternoon. He had not come in for a few days, and was n

314142
Postr/NootropicsJun 11, 2016

Threats from Brainstorm Nootropics / PowerFocus

Some of you may have seen the new vendor post about a week ago for a new product called PowerFocus, from Brainpower Nootropics . The owner has deleted it now, but you can see the comments in the link below; minus the com

24098COA