Comment · Thu, December 27, 2012
What they were answering
starkid · 1 points
what about st john warts?
u/MisterYouAreSoDumb
That is a mild MAOI and SSRI. It actually has an interesting effect of up-regulating serotonin receptors. This will not affect 5-HT production, though.
Comment · Thu, December 27, 2012 · 2 pts
No, that is incorrect. 5-HTP readily passes the blood brain barrier. However, it also readily converts to serotonin in your periphery by the enzyme aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase. This is bad because serotonin, or 5
Comment · Thu, December 27, 2012 · 3 pts
**MDMA is NOT an SRI.** It is a serotonin releaser. It reverses the action of your SERT, causing your neuronal synapse to flood with excess 5-HT. This is a big distinction for many reasons, which I will not get into at t
Comment · Thu, December 27, 2012 · 0 pts
What you are describing in down-regulation of the 5-HT receptors. This is a different mechanism to serotonin depletion. MDMA also lowers your body's ability to produce serotonin. The two ring-hydroxylated metabolites of
Comment · Thu, December 27, 2012 · 2 pts
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8496826 __________________________________________________ Also, if you really want a read, go through the post I made a while back on /r/DrugNerds http://www.reddit.com/r/DrugNerds
Comment · Thu, December 27, 2012 · 2 pts
Just always take 5-HTP with EGCG (Green tea extract).
Comment · Thu, December 27, 2012 · 2 pts
Everyone seems to have many questions about MDMA. I've typed out more than I care to think about on the subject. If you want some reading, here are my posts and comments to take a look at: http://www.reddit.com/r/DrugNe
Comment · Thu, December 27, 2012 · 1 pts
Yes there are! I have them on my computer. There are rat, mice, primate, and human studies. The dosing ranges anywhere from the human equivalent of 1mg/kg of MDMA to 4mg/kg. These are normal recreational doses. Read thr
Comment · Fri, December 28, 2012 · 1 pts
No, definitely not. It's pretty safe.
Replying to [deleted] · From an evolutionary view we are pretty much the same people today as we were then. They were still smart just didn't have all the accumulated knowledge we have today.
They had the similar potential, but development of neuronal connections is dependent on learning and usage. Since they weren't subject to nearly the same level of stimuli during their development, their intellectual capa
Replying to [deleted] · [deleted]
In my scientific Google study, I can confirm the article's findings. [With](https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=women+with+endometriosis&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&biw=1600&bih=762&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&sou
Replying to rdesktop7 · Because those CEOs are not breaking any laws. You can put sugar pills in a bottle, and call it anything you want as long as it's listed as a "supplement".
That's not true. Label claims and concentration are absolutely regulated. [Read 21 CFR 111](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-111). All supplements have to be at or above label claim, with
Replying to threeminus · Based on my research, I'd say optimal order is run -> smoke -> shower.
run -> smoke -> shower -> smoke -> eat FTFY
Replying to [deleted] · [deleted]
I hope eventually you realize that cautionary logic, and trust for those around you, are not mutually exclusive. People are stupid, emotional, under-informed, over-reactionary, and generally ignorant. However, they are a
Replying to _angel · It depends how strong the dose is. It takes 2 months from someone who has no serotonin in their system to go to full, kind of like filling up a water tower. However, if someone t…
That's such a massive oversimplification. There is absolutely no way to measure amounts of serotonin depletion in live subjects. Also, the rate at which it is replenished is dependent on many variables, like the amount o