Comment · Sun, September 30, 2012
Women with endometriosis tend to be more attractive
What they were answering
[deleted] · 284 points
[deleted]
Comment · Sun, September 30, 2012
What they were answering
[deleted] · 284 points
[deleted]
Comment · Sun, September 30, 2012 · 49 pts
She is an outlier in the sample.
Comment · Sun, September 30, 2012 · 13 pts
I did in my final published paper. I was just linking my hard data for peer review.
Comment · Sun, September 30, 2012 · 20 pts
Only if you have already turned your Google safe search off, you dirty dirty bird.
Comment · Sun, September 30, 2012 · 11 pts
Perhaps I will. I'd want to conduct a secondary study in Italy. I would have 10 Italian men in pink shirts and Gucci sunglasses stand on a street corner. I would then send 50 women with endometriosis and 50 without past
Comment · Sun, September 30, 2012 · 1 pts
Yeah, well that's just like your opinion, man.
Replying to [deleted] · From an evolutionary view we are pretty much the same people today as we were then. They were still smart just didn't have all the accumulated knowledge we have today.
They had the similar potential, but development of neuronal connections is dependent on learning and usage. Since they weren't subject to nearly the same level of stimuli during their development, their intellectual capa
Replying to rdesktop7 · Because those CEOs are not breaking any laws. You can put sugar pills in a bottle, and call it anything you want as long as it's listed as a "supplement".
That's not true. Label claims and concentration are absolutely regulated. [Read 21 CFR 111](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-111). All supplements have to be at or above label claim, with
Replying to threeminus · Based on my research, I'd say optimal order is run -> smoke -> shower.
run -> smoke -> shower -> smoke -> eat FTFY
Replying to [deleted] · [deleted]
I hope eventually you realize that cautionary logic, and trust for those around you, are not mutually exclusive. People are stupid, emotional, under-informed, over-reactionary, and generally ignorant. However, they are a
Replying to _angel · It depends how strong the dose is. It takes 2 months from someone who has no serotonin in their system to go to full, kind of like filling up a water tower. However, if someone t…
That's such a massive oversimplification. There is absolutely no way to measure amounts of serotonin depletion in live subjects. Also, the rate at which it is replenished is dependent on many variables, like the amount o
Well I think it has a lot to with spiders biting you, when butterflies do not.