Comment · Tue, May 24, 2016
Mk-677
Original post in this thread
metoo79 · 11 points
I was curious how testing was going on the latest batches. Thanks!
What they were answering
zacharyvoase · 2 points
Kind of worried that superiorpeptides.com says "≥98% (HPLC)" on their MK-677 product page…I emailed their support to ask if I could see a copy of the HPLC report :)
UPDATE: they got back to me with this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/hc4m21thqnvllzy/COA%20MK-677.pdf?dl=0
Note that the batch was manufactured and tested in March 2015. I don't know if they're still selling from the same batch though.
u/MisterYouAreSoDumb
I would bet a lot of money they are not doing jack shit for testing. We just tested some of their CJC-1295 non-DAC, and it was not a clean read on the HPLC, even though our CJC was a 98.92% using the same methods. I am having my analytical chemist run it again, along with CJC from Blue Sky as well.
Regardless, there are only a couple labs making MK-677 right now, and I have ordered from both. Both are putting out impure shit. For Superior Peptides to have found an MK-677 lab that I don't know about, would be very surprising. Is it possible? Sure. However, I highly doubt it.