Comment · Sat, August 9, 2014 · Ceretropic
My experience with TrueLIFE Researchs HCBT-OX
Original post in this thread
[deleted] · 1 points
We've already talked about their business practises here and here, so let's focus on the actual products this time ;)
You can read more about HCBT-OX on their info page here.
Appearance: Dark brown resinous solid
Very true, reminds me of freebase psilocin, hehe.
Anyway, I've tried it twice so far, so here we go.
---
First trial
21:05: 30mg swallowed on empty stomach.
21:15: Maybe something, slight mood lift, probably placebo.
21:25: There might be a hint of music enhancement. Serotonergic activity? ;)
21:30: Slight time dilation, also feeling more focused, no anxiety.
21:41: If I had to guess, this is a mild NMDA antagonist and SRI. Probably I'm completely wrong.
21:45: Strong mood lift, also seems to suppress appetite, clear headed "high".
22:40: Chatting on IRC, effects faded a little.
23:00: It's a little introspective.
00:00: Very "peaceful" somehow.
00:30: No crash or anything, feeling slightly tired.
---
Second trial
22:30: 60mg swallowed on empty stomach.
22:35: Strong euphoria.
22:55: Clear head high, stimulating.
23:00: Comparabl…
What they were answering
roionsteroids · -1 points
I am not sure why we are talking about tianeptine, though.
I mentioned it because it took a long time to fully understand its mechanism (if that is actually the case already!), and if someone years ago didn't know what he know about it today and mixed it with other drugs, it could have been potentially harmful.
But you know people are going to see the word euphoria and want to try it without thinking.
Pretty much 100% of the drugs I'm taking causes euphoria ;>
Even the shittiest cathinone produces euphoria. If that is a argument...
u/MisterYouAreSoDumb · Ceretropic
It takes a long time to fully understand the mechanisms for everything. The first step in that is knowing what the substance is! I don't understand how that is an argument for the use of this mystery substance.
Am I really blowing this that much out of proportion? You took a substance that you have no idea the chemical composition of, and no idea what brain systems it affects. You did that because some unnamed team stated that they have been researching things for 15 years, but show no evidence of that being the case. And you are justifying that decision by mentioning that we don't have a ton of evidence for some other substances out there. Am I really off base for thinking this is kind of crazy?