Skip to content

Comment · Tue, August 13, 2013 · Ceretropic

Energy and IQ - A common mechanism?

Original post in this thread

PasswordIS09876 · 12 points

Note: when I say IQ I'm talking about only the reason making sections similar to Advance Progressive Matrices/Raven Matrices.

There are very few studies showing interventions that increase IQ/Raven Matrices/APM but it seems that among those that do there may be a common mechanism. That mechanism seems to be increased neuronal metabolism.

Creatine has also been shown to increase performance on the Raven Matrices test, for vegetarians and meat eaters alike 1 2. There is some talk about creatine not being a cognitive enhancer for meat-eaters, but its IQ increasing effects have never been refuted only its effects on less demanding tasks. Given creatine seems to be an energy buffer, it seems entirely plausible that it wouldn't affect less intensive tasks. The supposed null result from creatine didn't measure anything related to IQ and was specifically designed to be able to find only the most robust effect, given its tiny sample size 3.

Then there's Ceretrophin™ which…

What they were answering

EnLilaSko · 1 points

Or supplement ATP directly - http://www.lef.org/Vitamins-Supplements/Item01323/Peak-ATP-with-GlycoCarn.html

Idk how effective it is, but some studies (well, one) showing that ATP + HMB is quite awesome for building LBM, adding creatine will most likely make it more awesome.

Have anyone seen any studies on ATP supplement and cognition?

EDIT: Isn't the new "TULIP stack" based on mitochondrial power (and thus ATP)?

u/MisterYouAreSoDumb · Ceretropic

I've heard good things about the PLCAR. People say it gives a lot more peripheral energy than ALCAR, where ALCAR gives more mental energy.

Now supplementation of ATP directly will not lead to increased intracellular ATP. That is why creatine is used. It gets transported into the cell, then leads to higher ATP levels. ATP that is supplemented directly breaks down quickly into adenosine outside of the cell. This means that it is not useful for energy within the cell. It has been shown to promote bloodflow, so that can help. However, it will not replace creatine.

Other MYASD lines in this thread

Related in the archive

Commentr/NootropicsFeb 24, 2021

Nootropics Depot not posting negative review

So we had to deal with some pretty big lawsuits last year. I wish I could say that is new, but I deal with half a dozen lawsuits every year. I just settled one two days ago, in fact. I have two more I am dealing with rig

475Lion’s maneCordyceps
Postr/NootropicsSep 18, 2013

Cerebral Health Pyritinol Test Results (WARNING)

Many of you may remember the issue that came up with Cerebral Health/Bioscience Nutraceuticals a few months ago, where their choline bitartrate was numbing people's mouths. After sending those samples in to the lab, the

491239OxiracetamAlpha-GPCRacetams
Postr/NootropicsJul 18, 2023

Independent Lab Testing Results Of Supplements On The Market

Hey everyone, it's been a while since I have made a post in this sub. However, I saw a new research study today that I wanted to bring up. It highlights why my main mission over the past 10 years has been to not only adv

402152Dosing
Commentr/NootropicsJun 11, 2018

Ceretropic will be closed permanently on 6/22/18

Almost exactly 5 years ago, Jason and I were creating Ceretropic and getting it ready for launch. It was mid June 2013. When you reach the end, you inevitably start looking back at the beginning. I had just had a shoulde

329
Postr/NootropicsNov 4, 2014

/u/Guacamolium

Unfortunately, I have some bad news. Jason (/u/Guacamolium), my business partner and co-founder of Ceretropic has died. He was found dead in his apartment on Friday afternoon. He had not come in for a few days, and was n

314142
Postr/NootropicsJun 11, 2016

Threats from Brainstorm Nootropics / PowerFocus

Some of you may have seen the new vendor post about a week ago for a new product called PowerFocus, from Brainpower Nootropics . The owner has deleted it now, but you can see the comments in the link below; minus the com

24098COA