Comment · Thu, April 16, 2015 · Ceretropic
Noots getting attention -- article linked to by Drudge! Good thing or bad thing?
What they were answering
Debonaire_Death · 2 points
I still think a crowdsourced group synth section would be brilliant for Ceretropic, where, at a minimal fee, an individual could anonymously commit a reasonable sum to a particular, uncertain synth endeavor, only losing the capacity to withdraw their contribution once the fund cap has been reached and the synth okayed. At the end, a person would receive a notification that their synth has been fully funded, followed shortly by a hopefully effective designer drug.
Ceretropic would be more of a reputable custodian for the funds and organizer of the synth: people could (I'm sure happily) sign away any potential harms that might befall them due to their experimentation. You could give people the chance to choose what compounds they want and try them out all of their own volition, removing the onus from you of the drug working and putting it wholly on the consumer's shoulders, except from a source they could trust.
u/MisterYouAreSoDumb · Ceretropic
Like and Indiegogo for chemical compounds? The issue is the time it takes to organize the test synthesis, scale it up to production, get the product into the country, get it tested for identification and purity, then package it up and get it ready for fulfillment. There is a lot that goes into it. It takes a lot of effort and time, which always seems to be in short supply.