Skip to content

Comment · Wed, January 28, 2015 · Ceretropic

Is this a dangerous subreddit filled with pseudoscience?

Original post in this thread

[deleted] · 169 points

I can find no way of objectively quantifying the contents of this subreddit that doesn't result in a straight-forward determination that it's filled with pseudoscience, which is inherently dangerous.

Has anyone considered that there should be far more disclaimers present in the sidebar and/or alongside all of the discussions happening here?

It seems that "a friend tried this relatively-unstudied herb and they noticed they were able to remember certain things better" is a valid post, when I think that most sane people would dismiss comments like this out-of-hand in any other context. Why do mods allow such threads? How is it not dangerous to perpetuate health-related "information" that is so anecdotal?

I hope we're willing to have an open, honest critique of ourselves. You should be genuinely concerned if this post gets massive downvotes or deleted by mods.

EDIT: The level of defensiveness is unbelievably over the top. We should always be erring on the side of caution, yet 100% of the replies are suggesting that everything is perfect, nothing can be improved, and that a couple sentences buried in the FAQ are all that could possibly be done. Others are telling me to unsubscribe…

What they were answering

ilove2dub · 2 points

Long time reader here. I agree that there is a reasonable middle ground.

I think a short but precise disclaimer ( a general one about nootropics not being a panacea for everything) with a stern but friendly "human physiology is a complicated beast, a beast which we hope you'll have a better understanding of during your time on r/nootropics , please develop as much of a knowledge base possible pertaining to any substance ( nootropic or otherwise) that you might be interesting in taking. Feel free to ask us if you need help."

and if some one is bored, we can link this to a new page packaging some really basic pharma and the types of considerations one should think about eg: Drug-Drug interactions etc.

u/MisterYouAreSoDumb · Ceretropic

Where would this message appear?

Other MYASD lines in this thread

Related in the archive

Commentr/NootropicsFeb 24, 2021

Nootropics Depot not posting negative review

So we had to deal with some pretty big lawsuits last year. I wish I could say that is new, but I deal with half a dozen lawsuits every year. I just settled one two days ago, in fact. I have two more I am dealing with rig

475Lion’s maneCordyceps
Postr/NootropicsSep 18, 2013

Cerebral Health Pyritinol Test Results (WARNING)

Many of you may remember the issue that came up with Cerebral Health/Bioscience Nutraceuticals a few months ago, where their choline bitartrate was numbing people's mouths. After sending those samples in to the lab, the

491239OxiracetamAlpha-GPCRacetams
Postr/NootropicsJul 18, 2023

Independent Lab Testing Results Of Supplements On The Market

Hey everyone, it's been a while since I have made a post in this sub. However, I saw a new research study today that I wanted to bring up. It highlights why my main mission over the past 10 years has been to not only adv

402152Dosing
Commentr/NootropicsJun 11, 2018

Ceretropic will be closed permanently on 6/22/18

Almost exactly 5 years ago, Jason and I were creating Ceretropic and getting it ready for launch. It was mid June 2013. When you reach the end, you inevitably start looking back at the beginning. I had just had a shoulde

329
Postr/NootropicsNov 4, 2014

/u/Guacamolium

Unfortunately, I have some bad news. Jason (/u/Guacamolium), my business partner and co-founder of Ceretropic has died. He was found dead in his apartment on Friday afternoon. He had not come in for a few days, and was n

314142
Postr/NootropicsJun 11, 2016

Threats from Brainstorm Nootropics / PowerFocus

Some of you may have seen the new vendor post about a week ago for a new product called PowerFocus, from Brainpower Nootropics . The owner has deleted it now, but you can see the comments in the link below; minus the com

24098COA