Skip to content

Comment · Wed, January 28, 2015 · Ceretropic

Is this a dangerous subreddit filled with pseudoscience?

Original post in this thread

[deleted] · 169 points

I can find no way of objectively quantifying the contents of this subreddit that doesn't result in a straight-forward determination that it's filled with pseudoscience, which is inherently dangerous.

Has anyone considered that there should be far more disclaimers present in the sidebar and/or alongside all of the discussions happening here?

It seems that "a friend tried this relatively-unstudied herb and they noticed they were able to remember certain things better" is a valid post, when I think that most sane people would dismiss comments like this out-of-hand in any other context. Why do mods allow such threads? How is it not dangerous to perpetuate health-related "information" that is so anecdotal?

I hope we're willing to have an open, honest critique of ourselves. You should be genuinely concerned if this post gets massive downvotes or deleted by mods.

EDIT: The level of defensiveness is unbelievably over the top. We should always be erring on the side of caution, yet 100% of the replies are suggesting that everything is perfect, nothing can be improved, and that a couple sentences buried in the FAQ are all that could possibly be done. Others are telling me to unsubscribe…

What they were answering

osazuwa · -3 points

got to take a tough tone with anti-scientific sentiment though. should one take a gentle tone with climate deniers and vaccine conspiracy theorists?

u/MisterYouAreSoDumb · Ceretropic

I generally take a tough tone when I feel it is warranted, and a soft one when either the tough standpoint has been covered by someone else, or I feel a more inviting tone would be more productive. You can yell all day long at climate deniers and vaccine nuts, but it will just make you tired. It's not going to change their views. If anything, it's going to make them more militant in those views. The only way to get someone to change, is to make that change come from within. That takes different strategies for different people.

Other MYASD lines in this thread

Related in the archive

Commentr/NootropicsFeb 24, 2021

Nootropics Depot not posting negative review

So we had to deal with some pretty big lawsuits last year. I wish I could say that is new, but I deal with half a dozen lawsuits every year. I just settled one two days ago, in fact. I have two more I am dealing with rig

475Lion’s maneCordyceps
Postr/NootropicsSep 18, 2013

Cerebral Health Pyritinol Test Results (WARNING)

Many of you may remember the issue that came up with Cerebral Health/Bioscience Nutraceuticals a few months ago, where their choline bitartrate was numbing people's mouths. After sending those samples in to the lab, the

491239OxiracetamAlpha-GPCRacetams
Postr/NootropicsJul 18, 2023

Independent Lab Testing Results Of Supplements On The Market

Hey everyone, it's been a while since I have made a post in this sub. However, I saw a new research study today that I wanted to bring up. It highlights why my main mission over the past 10 years has been to not only adv

402152Dosing
Commentr/NootropicsJun 11, 2018

Ceretropic will be closed permanently on 6/22/18

Almost exactly 5 years ago, Jason and I were creating Ceretropic and getting it ready for launch. It was mid June 2013. When you reach the end, you inevitably start looking back at the beginning. I had just had a shoulde

329
Postr/NootropicsNov 4, 2014

/u/Guacamolium

Unfortunately, I have some bad news. Jason (/u/Guacamolium), my business partner and co-founder of Ceretropic has died. He was found dead in his apartment on Friday afternoon. He had not come in for a few days, and was n

314142
Postr/NootropicsJun 11, 2016

Threats from Brainstorm Nootropics / PowerFocus

Some of you may have seen the new vendor post about a week ago for a new product called PowerFocus, from Brainpower Nootropics . The owner has deleted it now, but you can see the comments in the link below; minus the com

24098COA