Skip to content

Comment · Fri, November 9, 2012

DEA Says It Will Ignore Marijuana Legalization

What they were answering

ulysses_lives · 1 points

"The right side of history"? Had the Confederacy won that war I have a feeling you'd say they were on the right side of history. ;) In fact, the Confederate states were the ones being screwed by the federal government in this case. Legally, slaves were property, not people, and freeing slaves was the federal government stealing from states. Sure, your current culture tells you slavery is wrong, but at the time it was just a fact. "Freedom for all" is just as much a cultural institution as slavery, and making claims about a "right side of history" is a huge historical bias.

Besides, the Union could have given a shit about human rights. Abolition was a means to an end, not a benevolent act of a white messiah.

I guess what I'm getting at is yeah, slavery is inhumane, but the Civil War wasn't about human rights. It's easy to look back at it now, at a time where there is (supposedly) more social equality, and say "Wow that's so great that the Union fought against slavery" but that's only because our textbooks and cultural consciousness are going to make the victor of the war look as righteous as possible. Historical actions were not motivated by our society's current values.

(Wow, sorry for that--admittedly off-topic--wall of text. Apparently this is something I'm pretty passionate about. And please don't take any of this personally. I've found that I've been able to learn a…

u/MisterYouAreSoDumb

Right side of history in that slavery is wrong, and humanity has unequivocally decided that to be the case. Not that their case about federal intervention was wrong. I agree with their stance about states having the rights to govern themselves, just not on issues of restricting human rights. If it had been about moonshine, or tobacco sales, or any other thing, I would be a confederate supporter.

Other MYASD lines in this thread

Related in the archive

Commentr/DrugsNov 8, 2012

Research Suggests no Neurotoxicity in MDMA

**I'm going to copy what I wrote on another thread:** _____________________________________________________ YES! Keep your damn body temperatures down people! http://www.maps.org/publications/1998_malberg_1.pdf http:

597PiracetamMagnesiumQuercetinDosing
Commentr/DrugsDec 19, 2012

Which substance, in your opinion, is the hardest to remember what happened afterwards? Also, what is your best blackout story?

Ativan (lorazepam) I was going to the Markus Schulz concert one night, here in Phoenix. At dinner, one of my friends rolls a pill across the table to me. He said it was an Ativan. I was like, ohh ok, thanks. I did not i

195
Postr/DrugsNov 22, 2012

MDMA Neurotoxicity Part 1 (Metabolites)

This is probably going to be the first in a series of discussions I start about MDMA. There's just too much information for one post. Therefore, I am going to start with one that is very interesting to me: MDMA's metabol

7776Quercetin
Commentr/DrugsApr 18, 2013

Experts: 5 Signs Your Teen Could Be Using Club Drug 'Molly' - This is one of the dumbest articles I've read in a long time.

>Molly is like the 70s version of crack Wait, what? I think they got their equivocation backwards, and their demographics mixed up. >but because the drug is so highly addicting, he said, "They're buying a lot of it."

72
Commentr/DrugsApr 9, 2013

How fucked am I r/drugs?

Don't ever admit anything to a police officer. EVER! The burden of proof is on them.

52
Commentr/DrugsApr 8, 2013

Man 'took 40,000 ecstasy tablets' - Doctors have revealed details of the biggest recorded user of ecstasy - a man estimated to have taken 40,000 ecstasy pills in his life.

Replying to Mentran · Why no redosing?

The metabolism characteristics of the drug mean that the first dose inhibits the main metabolic pathway, CYP2D6. This means that any subsequent doses are more likely to use the secondary metabolic pathway, CYP3A4. The CY

44Dosing