Comment · Thu, November 8, 2012
What they were answering
charlestheblack · 8 points
However, that was a case for human rights.
One could argue that this is too.
u/MisterYouAreSoDumb
Right, but the opposite direction. The states are not taking away human rights, where the federal government has to step in. The states are trying to give rights, and the feds are saying no.
Comment · Thu, November 8, 2012 · 5 pts
This is exactly what started our civil war. However, that was a case for human rights. The states were on the wrong side of that one. This one on the other hand, is not. The federal government is on the wrong side of thi
Comment · Thu, November 8, 2012 · 6 pts
Agreed. Legalization on a federal level is the only way to stop it totally.
Comment · Thu, November 8, 2012 · 3 pts
Alex Kozinski, judge on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said this regarding the California medical marijuana law, which I think would apply to Colorado in this case: >I believe the federal government's policy runs afou
Comment · Fri, November 9, 2012 · 1 pts
Sure, I would agree. My equivocation was more to do with states rights to regulate themselves. The reason the union was on the right side of history is they were fighting for the human rights of slaves. That's not necess
Comment · Fri, November 9, 2012 · 1 pts
Right side of history in that slavery is wrong, and humanity has unequivocally decided that to be the case. Not that their case about federal intervention was wrong. I agree with their stance about states having the righ
**I'm going to copy what I wrote on another thread:** _____________________________________________________ YES! Keep your damn body temperatures down people! http://www.maps.org/publications/1998_malberg_1.pdf http:
Ativan (lorazepam) I was going to the Markus Schulz concert one night, here in Phoenix. At dinner, one of my friends rolls a pill across the table to me. He said it was an Ativan. I was like, ohh ok, thanks. I did not i
This is probably going to be the first in a series of discussions I start about MDMA. There's just too much information for one post. Therefore, I am going to start with one that is very interesting to me: MDMA's metabol
>Molly is like the 70s version of crack Wait, what? I think they got their equivocation backwards, and their demographics mixed up. >but because the drug is so highly addicting, he said, "They're buying a lot of it."
Don't ever admit anything to a police officer. EVER! The burden of proof is on them.
Replying to Mentran · Why no redosing?
The metabolism characteristics of the drug mean that the first dose inhibits the main metabolic pathway, CYP2D6. This means that any subsequent doses are more likely to use the secondary metabolic pathway, CYP3A4. The CY