Comment · Tue, June 11, 2024 · ND Owner
Yall wanna explain dis 😂
Original post in this thread
bruhman123534t6 · 0 points
“We received a letter from an attorney representing Nootropics Depot, which sells the Nootropics Depot Shoden product that was Not Approved in this Review as we found only 23.5 mg of the 42 mg of withanolides that we expected based on its label. The letter claims that "the testing method you employed... was materially deficient, was not designed or intended to result in a fair and complete analysis of the withanolide glycosides in the Nootropics Depot Shoden... and resulted in a material understatement of the withanolide glycosides..." The letter demands that we retract our information about the product and cease publication of this Review, and, essentially, threatens legal action if we do not comply. We have no reason to believe that the information that we published about Nootropics Depot Shoden is incorrect and, therefore, do not intend to retract our information about it or delete this Review. We are alwa…
What they were answering
btc912 · -5 points
It seems like that is what is being brought into question by the consumer labs report.
u/MisterYouAreSoDumb · ND Owner
I am bringing Consumer Lab's entire model into question, which is why we are taking legal action. They use flawed testing to rank products, then try to strong arm brands into paying them. If you pay them, you have more ability to work with them on results before they are publicly posted. If you don't pay them, they might randomly drop results like this without warning, then ghost you when you try to contact them to clear up the testing methodology issues. Literally the only recourse after that is legal action, which we are taking.