Skip to content

Comment · Wed, November 9, 2022 · ND Owner

3rd party lab testing for ND?

Original post in this thread

MovedHat · 21 points

I have seen the scandal concerning MYASD(as ND) doing testing on Gorilla Mind products.

MYASD as also talked about how 3rd party testing is important in the industry but I have not seen 3rd party test certificates(or that i could find) in ND.

I am not trying to start beef as I know ND is a well trusted company. But you cannot point fingers at someone when you also haven’t given 3rd party lab test results? I will also give the benefit of the doubt of in-house lab testing.

Or I could have just made a mistake by not doing insufficient research. If anyone has related information(and documents) about ND’s product and 3rd party testing, please do show me!
I am just looking for evidence that ND is what it claims and stands for.

Or maybe how in house testing is proven to be unbiased and reports will be scientifically accurate?

EDIT: wow, I am not expecting so many people commenting about my question. Im more surprised no one as really asked this question. As someone who studies science, I just think everything should be transparent and as open as possible(not saying ND is avoiding it).

I would love to see actual evidence that in house testing is 100% unbiased or even reviewed by a…

What they were answering

MisterYouAreSoDumb · 35 points

I have said proper lab testing and quality control is important for the industry. Whether or not that proper lab testing is being done by a 3rd party lab or an in-house lab depends on the specific lab, if they are ISO certified, and if they are using proper chemistry for their testing. Our lab is an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab that has been certified multiple times through audits by the independent firm Perry Johnson Laboratories. We have gotten perfect scores on all the ISO audits we have gotten to date, so the validity of our lab testing is being reviewed by a 3rd party accreditation company. Perry Johnson adheres to the ISO/IEC 17011:2017 standard for that process.

Here is our lab site: https://omnientlabs.com/

It's technically a 3rd party lab, but it is owned by me and run by my team, so we call it in-house. You can search Perry Johnson's site for our ISO certification.

https://www.pjlabs.com/search-accredited-organizations

Here is a direct link: https://www.pjview.com/clients/pjl/viewcert.cfm?certnumber=20856

So that is our lab. It's absolutely audited to ensure we are properly running every aspect to the ISO/IEC 17025:2017 standard. However, that's not all we do. We still do 3rd party lab testing with half a dozen other ISO certified labs in the US. Alkemist is a big one we use a lot. This is especially true for novel plants, as we don't have any certified bot…

u/MisterYouAreSoDumb · ND Owner

...Continued from above...

That's the novel stuff. What about the basic everyday stuff? We do that all in-house? Hell no! We still have to send off TONS of samples to other 3rd party ISO certified labs, for methods we have not yet developed, for machines we don't yet have in our lab, or for difficult methodologies/methods we are just not suited to yet. We have a lot of smart people in our lab, but you can't be an expert on everything. I also can't afford every piece of equipment I would want in a lab, nor can I find all the qualified people to run the machines yet. We partner with a 3rd party lab in California to do all our NMR work, as those machines are millions of dollars, take up whole rooms, and need liquid nitrogen to run. We even work with another lab to do more complex two dimensional and quant NMR, as not all labs with an NMR can do all the specific types or methods on them. So just because a lab has an NMR doesn't mean they can do it all. There is proton NMR, carbon NMR, phosphorus NMR, etc. Then you have heavy metals. We send off all our heavy metals to another 3rrd party ISO certified lab, as we don't have an ICP-MS in our lab yet. They are just down the street from us, and we drop our samples off to them directly, so it's much easier to just let them do what they are best at and not spend $300K or more building out that capability in our lab. Then there is another 3rd party ISO certified lab we use in Utah for methods/methodologies we can't do in-house. They have a Karl Fischer water content method, which we don't have, so they run that for us. Some times the specific properties of a raw material means you have to run Karl Fischer instead of LOD. They have an ion pair detector on their UPLC, which we don't have. So they can run methods for things like L-5-Methyltetrahydrofolate Calcium. We can also do tests that they can't do. This means they send us samples as well. They don't have HP-TLC for the ID of species and plant part, so they send samples to us at Omnient to test for them, too. We often collaborate with other labs in the industry. It's not just a one way street. We also help out other supplement companies with testing through Omnient Labs. Arizona Nutritional Supplements had a bunch of their machines go down one day, so we were able to take over their sample load testing for a bit till they could get the machines back up. Multiple other supplement companies submit samples to us for testing. Omnient Labs is truly a 3rd party lab that any vendor can submit samples to and get COAs for their products. We aren't just working with other labs and supplement brands, either. We are part of the NIST\(National Institute of Standards and Technology\) proficiency testing program. That's a US government run organization that sets standards and operates programs to test the proficiency of analytical labs. We are part of that program, and have done multiple rounds of testing through it. We developed a cannabis assay method for one of their rounds, even though we don't sell cannabis. We also developed a comprehensive gingerols/shoagals assay for another round. The NIST proficiency program lets you run tests for samples that NIST sends you, then compares your results to labs from all over the US. We are also members of the AOAC (Association of Official Agricultural Chemists), and attend the annual AOAC conference every year. This year it was actually in Scottsdale, so our lab director just had to drive up there to attend. In previous years he has had to fly back to the east coast for it. Lots of lab directors go to this AOAC conference. He met the head of lab testing for NOW Foods at this last one, and has been fervently calling out the bad actors we have found at these conferences. This is where everyone gets together and discusses the current state of the analytical lab industry.

So that is a long-winded reply (not that anyone here expected less), but I have a lot to say about all the scientific work we have been doing over the years. It's the entire reason I built this company, and I am very proud of what we have accomplished. Simplifying things down into "in-house lab" and "3rd party lab" doesn't do the complexity justice. What matters is using validated chemistry to measuring things properly, and to ensure that the numbers you are getting are actually telling you what you think they are. Nobody cares more about that than I do. I spend years getting to the bottom of a chemistry problem, or decide to just not sell something till I can solve the science. Everyone on my team is passionate about analytical chemistry and the validity of the science we are using to prove our products are as we claim. I have built a world class ISO certified analytical lab. We also work with a handful of other 3rd party ISO certified analytical labs to get the scientific answers we need on every product. No one single lab can do all the chemistry right. Anyone that says otherwise is naive or a liar. It takes a community of labs working together to solve some of these more complex scientific things. This is especially true on the extremely novel work we are doing on products like lion's mane and other plants/fungi. I can honestly say that our lab, in concert with our various partner labs, are doing science that no other lab in the world is doing. Sometimes solving these things is more of a passion for me than anything else. I live for this stuff! So hopefully that adequately explains things a bit better. I know it is a meme from our competitors that "Nootropics Depot doesn't do 3rd party lab testing," but that can't be further from the truth. I bet we do more 3rd party lab testing every month than most of our competitors, on top of our in house lab. I see the bills, that's for sure! Everything we do is in furtherance of advancing the lab testing and quality control standards of not just ourselves, but the entire industry.

If you have not seen it, I did do a quick lab walk-through on YouTube where I show a lot of the machines: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VkhuGK21U8

Our product specialist, /u/PrettyChill, also has an Instagram where he shows a couple of our lion's mane grows: https://www.instagram.com/prettychill_nd/

Thank you for coming to my TEDx talk!

Other MYASD lines in this thread

Related in the archive

Commentr/NootropicsDepotMay 18, 2024

u/MisterYouAreSoDumb asked me to post the Lab Testing COAs I received from Bulk Supplements (Below)

That's about what I expected. These are just internal COAs. To start, analyzing nitrogen content is not an appropriate methodology for amino acid assay. This is the same shit China got away with on infant formula and spi

99Lion’s maneCOA
Commentr/NootropicsDepotJul 22, 2023

Deception in Dietary Supplements: Fake Labs, Faulty Data, and COA Red Flags

Replying to DDsPLZ · Given the existence of "dry labs" offering COA's, i.e. an empty building that will sell you whatever COA you like... aren't COA's useless? I see people tell me not to buy from ND

I mean, yes... somewhat for the average consumer. This is why we made this video. COAs aren't totally useless, as you can spot inconsistencies and get a better idea of whether or not the brand has any idea about analytic

19Lion’s maneCOA
Commentr/NootropicsDepotJun 29, 2020

To eat or not to eat, that is the question

Replying to TestSubject008765 · I saw it on the sub somewhere that niacin helps the lions mane cross the blood brain barrier. What about blackpepper helps the absorptions of nootropics? I’m starting to think th

Ahh, that's right. Paul Stamets same up with that niacin theory. He's an idiot when it comes to chemistry and pharmacology, though. I think the niacin thing is total bullshit, but I will speak to our PhD lion's mane rese

9Lion’s maneCOACurcumin
Commentr/NootropicsDepotMar 12, 2025

Is ND done launching new products?

Replying to HenryVonWilheimer · Will you be releasing any of the Erinamax extracts you were testing out that would be standardized to a higher amount of Erinacine-A and/or other interesting erinacines? Also w

Yes, we are still working on extracts of lion's mane mycelium. However, some beta testing we did make me pause, as I think the idea that extracts are better might not be true. Everyone parrots around that like it is fact

8Lion’s maneCOA
Commentr/NootropicsDepotJan 26, 2021

Lion's Mane 1:1

Replying to bignatedogger · how come you don't post test results of the amount of active ingredients in your Lion mane?

We do. There is a spec sheet up on the page, and we can get you the COA from a batch if you want. Since you have posted in /r/MushroomSupplements, which is a subreddit that regularly spreads false information and has a v

7Lion’s maneCOA
Commentr/NootropicsDepotDec 29, 2020

Accuracy of beta-glucan analysis

Replying to chutney1 · This is why I love ND. I know you're a busy man and that took some time to compose. And it sounds like the question is pretty old-hat for you at this point. So thank you for takin

It's my pleasure! I've definitely been pushing the same message for years. It's just many people are being misled by propaganda and faulty science, both on the Paul Stamets side and on the /r/MushroomSupplements side. Th

7ModafinilLion’s maneAshwagandhaCOA