Skip to content

Comment · Thu, August 29, 2013 · Ceretropic

If Dual-N-Back training can truly improve working memory, why doesn't it appear to improve Gf?

Original post in this thread

[deleted] · 8 points

After perusing some of the relevant literature, it appears that the general consensus on DNB training is that it's able to increase WM (or at least some aspect of WM), but does not seem to increase fluid intelligence in young, healthy adults (although a lot more research in this area is clearly needed).

It's well established that WMC is highly correlated with Gf. I personally don't think that fluid intelligence and the capacity for learning is purely WMC, but WM certainly seems to be a large contributor to fluid intelligence. I would find it hard to believe that a significant increase in working memory, at its core, would not correspond to a significant increase in Gf.

So, why doesn't DNB appear to increase Gf, as measured by tests of "far transfer" like RAPM? Does this suggest that DNB training is only improving on a certain aspect of WM? Are DNB gains simply a product of learning/practice effects? Is WMC merely a correlate of Gf? etc.

Thoughts?

What they were answering

ThoughtfulJoker · 1 points

Glad we could come to a working agreement.

I think if there is any limiting pathways it would be firing rates of neurons and the energy they require to do so.

Creatine, coq10, ALCAR are all nootropic supplements suposedly meant to aid cognition off the back of more mental energy.

The brain named the brain. Do our brains want to be called brains? Idk

u/MisterYouAreSoDumb · Ceretropic

Agreed. I think ATP transport and synthesis is the limiting factor.

The naming of the brain is fairly subjective, as different languages call it different things. However, the way we interpret mathematics, or design computer systems, is fairly universal. I know people talk about mathematics and physics as laws. However, aren't they just another form of language that defines how our brains interpret the world around us? This is more of an existential thought than anything else.

Other MYASD lines in this thread

Related in the archive

Commentr/NootropicsFeb 24, 2021

Nootropics Depot not posting negative review

So we had to deal with some pretty big lawsuits last year. I wish I could say that is new, but I deal with half a dozen lawsuits every year. I just settled one two days ago, in fact. I have two more I am dealing with rig

475Lion’s maneCordyceps
Postr/NootropicsSep 18, 2013

Cerebral Health Pyritinol Test Results (WARNING)

Many of you may remember the issue that came up with Cerebral Health/Bioscience Nutraceuticals a few months ago, where their choline bitartrate was numbing people's mouths. After sending those samples in to the lab, the

491239OxiracetamAlpha-GPCRacetams
Postr/NootropicsJul 18, 2023

Independent Lab Testing Results Of Supplements On The Market

Hey everyone, it's been a while since I have made a post in this sub. However, I saw a new research study today that I wanted to bring up. It highlights why my main mission over the past 10 years has been to not only adv

402152Dosing
Commentr/NootropicsJun 11, 2018

Ceretropic will be closed permanently on 6/22/18

Almost exactly 5 years ago, Jason and I were creating Ceretropic and getting it ready for launch. It was mid June 2013. When you reach the end, you inevitably start looking back at the beginning. I had just had a shoulde

329
Postr/NootropicsNov 4, 2014

/u/Guacamolium

Unfortunately, I have some bad news. Jason (/u/Guacamolium), my business partner and co-founder of Ceretropic has died. He was found dead in his apartment on Friday afternoon. He had not come in for a few days, and was n

314142
Postr/NootropicsJun 11, 2016

Threats from Brainstorm Nootropics / PowerFocus

Some of you may have seen the new vendor post about a week ago for a new product called PowerFocus, from Brainpower Nootropics . The owner has deleted it now, but you can see the comments in the link below; minus the com

24098COA