Just an abused elephant killing people.

Comment · Wed, May 2, 2012 · -31 pts

I would withhold my cruelty, even in the worst of times! I would be physically unable to participate in animal cruelty, even if feeding my family relied upon it. There is always another way!

Comment · Wed, May 2, 2012 · -1 pts

Somewhat granted. But you have no idea where my life has taken me. I may be on the internet now, with the ability to make these type of claims to you. However, I have also been in very different circumstances. I have bee

Comment · Wed, May 2, 2012 · -1 pts

You are incorrect about that sir.

Comment · Wed, May 2, 2012 · 0 pts

Yes. We are not talking about killing an animal for food here, we are talking about animal cruelty. I would find another way.

Comment · Wed, May 2, 2012 · 2 pts

My username is just that, a moniker. I did not pick it to insinuate anything about the posters that I reply to.

Comment · Wed, May 2, 2012 · -4 pts

That is a blanket statement. India is a 3rd world country, yet people are taught to respect all life, including animals.

Comment · Wed, May 2, 2012 · 2 pts

That would be killing for food, not participating in animal cruelty. That I would be able to justify.

Comment · Wed, May 2, 2012 · 4 pts

ALMOST! My line ends at animal cruelty! I would kill to protect, even kill to provide food. However, cruelty would not be on the table for me.

Comment · Wed, May 2, 2012 · 3 pts

I was not condemning their actions. I was merely stating that I would be unable to participate in that action. My reply was geared toward the notion that anyone would do this to feed their family, which is not the case.

Comment · Wed, May 2, 2012 · 0 pts

Well time will tell on that one, won't it? I seem to have brought myself up from the bottom to run my own worldwide telecommunications company. And I have done all this using my own morals and personal set of values. You

Comment · Wed, May 2, 2012 · 0 pts

Your claim that natural selection will eventually take me was the reasoning for my reference. Call it bragging if you will, but that can be said about any personal reference in positive light. My point was there is neve

Comment · Wed, May 2, 2012 · 1 pts

Granted that there are subjective distinctions on where the line is drawn. I think most people would include hanging a dog in a bag off the back of a truck as past that line though. If you do need to resort to taking a l

Comment · Wed, May 2, 2012 · 0 pts

Nowhere did I say that I was morally superior. It's the same as if I was saying that I would not wear a certain color because I did not like it. I am not condemning the people in question, as I have stated many times. I

Comment · Wed, May 2, 2012 · 1 pts

Well my personal views would dictate that they can feel pain and fear, so I would not want to subject them to that. Again, that is a socialized notion based upon my upbringing, but that is what I have to work with!

Comment · Wed, May 2, 2012 · 0 pts

The implication of moral superiority is subjective you moron! It is subjective based upon your inference, not mine. There was no intentional implication on my part, thus my statement "Any implication otherwise is not int

Comment · Wed, May 2, 2012 · 0 pts

You are arguing semantics. I could call you stupid, while also considering myself stupid. The two are not mutually exclusive. Again, the implication is subjective. You are assuming that there are only two options. The "