MK-677 Stock update

Comment · Sat, May 28, 2016 · 4 pts

We just got a sample in from the new batch, and it the solvent peak we were seeing on the other batches is gone now. We are HPLCing it, and sending to a 3rd party lab, just to be sure. It's looking promising. Once that i

Comment · Sun, May 29, 2016 · 5 pts

Risk mainly. We are migrating to a new site soon, and will be offering some of those compounds to approved accounts, though.

Comment · Wed, June 1, 2016 · 3 pts

Loosely, yes. Nothing is set in stone yet, though. We are always waiting on someone. So things have been continually pushed back.

Comment · Sat, June 4, 2016 · 3 pts

The samples are at both labs right now. They don't work on the weekend like we do, though. So we should have answers sometime next week.

Comment · Fri, June 10, 2016 · 8 pts

Ohh no, we know. You just won't like the answer. It's not pure... [Here is our in-house FTIR comparison of the sample to Sigma.](http://i.imgur.com/pvFTNOC.jpg) You can see the peak at 1,740 is gone. So that solvent re

Comment · Sat, June 11, 2016 · 3 pts

That's an understatement. We've never had so many quality issues with a single compound. We've really been trying to get this shit taken care of. You can see we got multiple other opinions on it, using different testing

Comment · Sat, June 11, 2016 · 1 pts

We certainly could, if it is just acetone. We might try doing that, now that we know the other solvent is gone. It's just more delays and headaches.

Comment · Sun, June 12, 2016 · 2 pts

We are either going to try to vacuum desiccate this, and remove the solvent residue, or we are going to make the lab do it. At least we know they can get rid of the other more harmful solvent, and they just need to accep

Comment · Mon, June 13, 2016 · 1 pts

Yes, I have considered it. Sigma Aldrich does not carry an Anamorelin standard yet, though. So we would need to pay to create a standard.

Comment · Mon, June 13, 2016 · 3 pts

They have been speaking to me, and just sent me a sample of their MK-677 to test. So I'll know more when it gets here. However, yes I have been speaking to them about the quality issues with MK-677.

Comment · Wed, June 15, 2016 · 1 pts

It's my pleasure!

Comment · Sat, June 18, 2016 · 2 pts

I'll let IRC discuss their stuff with their customers. I still need to HPLC their sample, but based on the smell and our FTIR, it is probably not pure. I am going back and forth with IRC about it, though. It appears to b

Comment · Fri, August 26, 2016 · 2 pts

We discontinued all SARMs and MK-677 for legal reasons, unfortunately.

Comment · Fri, August 26, 2016 · 2 pts

It's a crapshoot right now. IRC.bio is at least trying to uphold standards for testing, and is speaking to me about how to improve. So I would use them for now.

Comment · Mon, August 29, 2016 · 1 pts

Not sure. Can't really tell from that. They are not the same methods we use.

Comment · Thu, October 13, 2016 · 1 pts

I can't really disclose the details. I am not currently aware of any new government legislation, though.

Comment · Tue, October 18, 2016 · 1 pts

My pleasure!