Comment · Thu, April 11, 2013
Anyone here try LSZ? (Lysergic acid 2,4-dimethylazetidide)
Original post in this thread
LSZer · 15 points
Throwaway account.
I bought what I thought was LSD from SR. Turns out I was out of it that night and the listing was for LSB! I got a message today from the vendor and he said that after testing, what I was getting was not LSB, but actually LSZ. The seller sent me a graph of what looks like a mass spec. Does anyone know how this differs in effects, side-effects, dosage, etc. to LSD? Would it be possible that it has bad drug interactions that LSD does not have (so it wouldn't be wise to candy-flip or drink a couple of beers?)
From what I've gathered from the internet this is a pretty rare thing, where some on /r/drugs believe it doesn't even exist. Kind of excited about that but at the same time was looking for some real LSD. Am I going to have the same awesome trip or is it going to be different and me getting disappointed?
What they were answering
johntheswan · 3 points
I'm probably misreading this paper. I'll put it out there for better, less stoned, minds to read and analyze. The point being, though that the active LSZ isomer is generally across the board more potent than LSD.
u/MisterYouAreSoDumb
Haha, yeah I think you misread it. It is confusing, though. They use 2a, 2b, and 2c to reference their tables, not to the receptor sub-types.
The paper does not reference the 5-HT2B sub-type at all. It's pretty much saying it is more selective to 5-HT2A than LSD. This is why the effects are more "pure" if you will. LSD has a higher affinity for dopamine than LSZ does.